Difference between revisions of "Talk:Uru:CC Installation"
(→Remove redirect) |
(→Remove redirect) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:KABOOM! :D Also, I think the current title is fine. It specifies clearly what it is talking about. However, it does conflict with the "TPOTS Sequence Prefixes" nomenclature (even though this is a minor point). Could that page be renamed to "Uru Sequence Prefixes", or is it really *just* for TPOTS?--[[User:Lyrositor|Lyrositor]] 07:16, 17 May 2012 (EDT) | :KABOOM! :D Also, I think the current title is fine. It specifies clearly what it is talking about. However, it does conflict with the "TPOTS Sequence Prefixes" nomenclature (even though this is a minor point). Could that page be renamed to "Uru Sequence Prefixes", or is it really *just* for TPOTS?--[[User:Lyrositor|Lyrositor]] 07:16, 17 May 2012 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Good catch. However, we should probably keep the redirect there since there is a whole bunch of external links to it, and the page is rather important. And it definitely is only about CC/TPOTS/UU ("old" Uru versions), the prefix space in MOUL is independent. For that reason, I renamed it to using "Uru:CC" as well (since almost nobody cares about UU anymore). -- [[User:Diafero|Diafero]] 13:39, 17 May 2012 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I agree. Let's keep the redirect. A job well done! :) --[[User:Lyrositor|Lyrositor]] 15:38, 17 May 2012 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:38, 17 May 2012
Remove redirect
Could someone remove the redirect from "TPOTS Installation" please? Also, I was unsure whether "CC Installation" or "Uru:CC Installation" would be more in line with the wording of the rest of the wiki... but then, it doesn't matter that much anyway ;-)
Diafero 05:36, 17 May 2012 (EDT)
- KABOOM! :D Also, I think the current title is fine. It specifies clearly what it is talking about. However, it does conflict with the "TPOTS Sequence Prefixes" nomenclature (even though this is a minor point). Could that page be renamed to "Uru Sequence Prefixes", or is it really *just* for TPOTS?--Lyrositor 07:16, 17 May 2012 (EDT)
- Good catch. However, we should probably keep the redirect there since there is a whole bunch of external links to it, and the page is rather important. And it definitely is only about CC/TPOTS/UU ("old" Uru versions), the prefix space in MOUL is independent. For that reason, I renamed it to using "Uru:CC" as well (since almost nobody cares about UU anymore). -- Diafero 13:39, 17 May 2012 (EDT)
- I agree. Let's keep the redirect. A job well done! :) --Lyrositor 15:38, 17 May 2012 (EDT)