Difference between revisions of "Talk:Archive:Main Page"
m (moved Talk:Main Page to Talk:Archive:Main Page: Archiving old wiki content)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
== Guild Essentials ==
 +
 
Is the '''''Guild Essentials''''' title really necessary? It's the only top-level header on the page. [[User:Floydman|Floydman]] 09:08, 5 August 2008 (EDT)
 
Is the '''''Guild Essentials''''' title really necessary? It's the only top-level header on the page. [[User:Floydman|Floydman]] 09:08, 5 August 2008 (EDT)
  
Line 9: Line 11:
  
 
Lol, I feel like I'm in therapy: "How does that make you feel?" I've just seen that it has been removed, but I'll answer anyway. As I stated earlier, it's the only top-level header on the page. If there's only one section on the main page, then there is no need to title it. It would be much the same as me putting this discussion under the title "Guild Essentials"; that would only be necessary if another discussion took place on this page. [[User:Floydman|Floydman]] 12:51, 5 August 2008 (EDT)
 
Lol, I feel like I'm in therapy: "How does that make you feel?" I've just seen that it has been removed, but I'll answer anyway. As I stated earlier, it's the only top-level header on the page. If there's only one section on the main page, then there is no need to title it. It would be much the same as me putting this discussion under the title "Guild Essentials"; that would only be necessary if another discussion took place on this page. [[User:Floydman|Floydman]] 12:51, 5 August 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
How prophetic!  [[User:Robert the rebuilder|Robert The Rebuilder]] 11:46, 26 August 2008 (EDT)
  
 
== Ahra Pahts section removal ==
 
== Ahra Pahts section removal ==
  
−
J'Kla: I removed the Ahra Pahts section because it is just one of many age projects underway.  It is already listed in the [[Ongoing Age Projects]] topic.  Also, the main page is getting quite long.
 
  
 
J'Kla: I removed the Ahra Pahts section because it is just one of many age projects underway.  It is already listed in the [[Ongoing Age Projects]] topic.  Also, the main page is getting quite long.
 
J'Kla: I removed the Ahra Pahts section because it is just one of many age projects underway.  It is already listed in the [[Ongoing Age Projects]] topic.  Also, the main page is getting quite long.
−
[[User:Robert the rebuilder|Robert the rebuilder]] 11:44, 26 August 2008 (EDT)
+
[[User:Robert the rebuilder|Robert The Rebuilder]] 11:44, 26 August 2008 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 13:06, 11 April 2011

Guild Essentials

Is the Guild Essentials title really necessary? It's the only top-level header on the page. Floydman 09:08, 5 August 2008 (EDT)

Well, does it bother you? Trylon 10:06, 5 August 2008 (EDT)

Personally, yes, but that's why I'm discussing it: to see if it bothers anyone else. Floydman 11:12, 5 August 2008 (EDT)

Ok, please tell us why it bothers you then... Trylon 12:13, 5 August 2008 (EDT)

Lol, I feel like I'm in therapy: "How does that make you feel?" I've just seen that it has been removed, but I'll answer anyway. As I stated earlier, it's the only top-level header on the page. If there's only one section on the main page, then there is no need to title it. It would be much the same as me putting this discussion under the title "Guild Essentials"; that would only be necessary if another discussion took place on this page. Floydman 12:51, 5 August 2008 (EDT)

How prophetic! Robert The Rebuilder 11:46, 26 August 2008 (EDT)

Ahra Pahts section removal

J'Kla: I removed the Ahra Pahts section because it is just one of many age projects underway. It is already listed in the Ongoing Age Projects topic. Also, the main page is getting quite long. Robert The Rebuilder 11:44, 26 August 2008 (EDT)